- Whence to me was the nobility, what it the provoker? - It is fine, the Lord with it...
- I and now am not assured not so that it the provoker...
- Stanislav Zinovevich, I to you already time three has repeated that we should trust each other. At us anybody, except us,
no. Only we together, and against us the whole world...
- Hm! - not "hm" namely so it also is. Listen now as affairs actually are.
And I to it have told all. Everything that knew itself, and everything what only guessed, and everything that could occur in
the near future. I did not have a special purpose it to intimidate, but to exaggerate I nevertheless did not hesitate. The Lord
with them, with details and with nuances, but by and large on a card now and really all has been put. Or nearly so all.
- Yes anywhere I will not go, - he has told nervously. - that it sdurel, your chief? - It not sdurel. It it is simple so has solved.
You probably have not understood. On you to it, forgive, it is deep nachhat. It uses you, that me to knock over. That I have
rebelled, and it then...
- Yes I have understood, have understood. Can be absolutely quiet: anywhere I will not go, in any boarding house.
- Stanislav Zinovevich, in our department are able to persuade.
- Probably. Even for certain. But it not that case.
- Become not eligible to travel abroad.
- The admission will select.
- You will think. It is worse.
- Will dismiss. During staff redundancies. Now, by the way, just there is a reduction.
- Anything. It always goes. I will not be gone. God will not give out, the pig will not eat.
I guessed, whom and that he means, remembering God. It was partly right: its this Ezhevatov - a strong nutlet, razgryzt it it will
be uneasy even to a my dear Companion to the Chief. Especially now, when the Academician cut an oak. Slippers, so to
say, has changed.
Actually, me the discussed problem a little interested. What to me (and to both of us) was a difference: boarding house
"«уево" or the old house on Charles Marx's prospectus? In a sense the boarding house even is better. But I saw that it -
very much would not like to leave (for what reasons - not very well), and it was interesting to me to learn, how it is far capable
to come in this unwillingness.
Probably, he attentively observed of my person, but has misunderstood my concern absolutely.
- You absolutely in vain doubt my determination, - he has said almost haughtily. - if I have told "was not present", means so it
and will be. I cannot be intimidated.
It which suddenly have broken, the arrogance has amazed me. Yes, it was strongly changed during the last days. From time
to time I ceased to understand it. And anyway I have ceased to see it through as it was still more recently.
- Hm, - I have solved slightly podzavesti it. He has recollected at once own "hm" and was got instantly.
- I repeat to you: I cannot be intimidated! - however he has there and then thought suddenly and has told tone more low: - I
could not be intimidated, understand? - Is not present.
- Well, no then also it is not necessary.
- The person always can be intimidated.
- Instead of the person? It has been strongly told. I have lifted hands.
- I surrender.